Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matteo Cervelli's avatar

Anna, thanks for sharing. Great essay.

Now it opens up a lot of questions. As a parent of 2 daughters, almost 5 and 2, I ask myself repeatedly, "What would be the best education I can provide to my daughters to make them more flexible in the future?"

I agree on some points, but on the contrary, I am thinking about how scheduled and robotics this sounds. Let me explain: I agree school is a daycare and people are in a comfort zone. How can we improve it? I agree: Their own pace is excellent. It permits the diversification of people.

On the other hand, some questions, ranging without an answer, emerged.

- we can't measure children's growth based on how much they score in hard skills only. How effectively are we sharing values and resilience in life? It is excellent to gamify against a computer. But what happens when shit arrives in life?

- Boring life vs. "slowing down potential". Relationships that grow from dull moments? Is it a gamification system? What about how to deal with unfair things? Are we trying to remove the randomness of human beings from nature?

- It seems that "passing exams", tests or skills evaluation, is the foundation of both schools. The main difference is the personalized approach to each one at a different speed.

When you learn something, you change your world, believing everyone has the same awareness level as you. I suppose teachers make the same mistake the same bias.

- And what about things that could be interesting later in life that do not motivate them right now?

From Austin's essay:

- "The solution is not to have more meetings". Agree. People make meetings because it's easier and frictionless than trying to understand the problem, listing causes, and going to see on their own. This is a flaw of a hierarchical society. To become more efficient in doing the manager, we do more meetings to move the problem to the lower level. But the problem is the problem that arrived at my position. And we don't focus on avoiding the problem of hiking levels.

On the contrary, meetings are essential to develop relationships and resilience. How can we have the best of both worlds?

Thanks again. Maybe these questions could provoke a new essay I would gladly read.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts