Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kevin Rigley's avatar

A fabulous and thoughtful piece. The idea that the Universe is a single, gigantic organism, with star dust and all cosmic elements being parts of this organism, aligns with holistic views that propose every part is interconnected and integral to the whole. Whilst this might offer a sense of unity and interconnectedness, such a view may lack practical utility, especially in scientific or empirical terms. It's a philosophical or metaphysical interpretation rather than a framework for scientific exploration or technological advancement. Sadly, I am a fan of the scientific method.

I think you would suggest as a corollary that free will does not exist. I would suggest firstly that the unit of consciousness is not neurocentric but found in a cellular matrix that includes glia cells. Even if free will might be an illusion created by our brain's processing, it is still real. I cannot align with the deterministic view that all events, including human actions, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will.

I prefer the idiom "condemned to be sentient" which highlights the existentialist perspective, where consciousness and sentience bring about a recognition of one's existence and the burdens or responsibilities that come with it. This emphasises the inescapable nature of consciousness and its existential weight, resonating with existentialism themes, where humans are seen as fundamentally free and responsible for their choices in an inherently meaningless universe. However, unlike Sartre et al., I think the collective consciousness of the human population replaces the formal structure of religion.

Expand full comment
svitlana-ing's avatar

I love how your writing includes multitude of references -- exactly what is needed after you sparked my curiosity Anna! Thank you for sharing your thoughts!!

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts